Tuesday, February 28, 2017

The True Cost of Mass Deportations

It’s American taxpayers who will bear the economic burdens of Trump’s immigration enforcement plans.

People protest outside of the Elizabeth Detention Center during a rally attended by immigrant residents and activists on February 23rd, 2017, in Elizabeth, New Jersey. (Photo: Spencer Platt/Getty Images)


Following widespread protests and a series of defeats in state and federal courts amid challenges to the president’s travel ban, the Trump administration last week released broad guidelines for the aggressive enforcement of immigration laws. The new directives, which are designed to empower state and local law enforcement officials to enforce federal immigration measures, came with rumors that the Department of Homeland Security had considered mobilizing some 100,000 National Guard troops to round up undocumented immigrants, sparking fears among migrant communities and civil rights advocates of mass deportations.

Department of Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly sought to allay those anxieties during an official trip to Mexico alongside Secretary of State Rex Tillerson last week. “Let me be clear, there will be no mass deportations, everything we do in DHS will be done legally,” Kelly said following meetings with Mexican officials, where he and Tillerson attempted to walk back the president’s harsh rhetoric toward America’s southern neighbor. “The focus of deportation will be on the criminal element, all of this will be done in close coordination with Mexico.”

President Donald Trump may want to heed his DHS chief’s advice. While it’s fairly well understood that America’s inward turn will have a deleterious effect on the country’s long-term competitiveness in research and innovation, new reports suggest that mass deportations would have an even more immediate effect on the United States’ economy. According to two independent reports, the implementation of mass deportations would reduce the national gross domestic product (GDP) by 1.4 percent in the first year alone and, ultimately, 2.6 percent in the next decade — a cumulative economic loss of $4.7 trillion.

 The reports, compiled by researchers at the the Center for Migration Studies and Center for American Progress over the last several months, paint a dire picture of an American economy strained by the sudden, rapid evaporation of its undocumented immigrant population. Of the 11.3 million undocumented residents targeted by the Trump administration, some seven million are workers (4.9 percent of the overall U.S. workforce), which means key industries that rely on migrant labor — agriculture, construction, and hospitality — would face workforce reductions between 10 and 18 percent, according to the CAP. The irony is that the bulk of the economic losses will be endured not by immigrant-dependent sectors, but large industries like financial activities, manufacturing, and the wholesale and retail trade, which stand to see annual losses of $193 billion total. Overall, U.S. industries face a short-run loss of $236 billion.


Forget business: Let’s talk about actual households. According to the CMS, there were 5.3 million households with at least one undocumented resident as of 2014, more than half of which (2.8 million) are home to nearly 5.7 million U.S.-born children under the age of 18. Swiftly removing undocumented residents from these mixed-status households would result in an immediate reduction of median household income from $41,300 to $22,000, a 47 percent drop that would suddenly place millions of American families below the poverty line. It’s also worth noting that some 2.4 million mortgages are held by households with undocumented occupants, per the CMS report, and their sudden absence would certainly make markets still recovering from the meltdown of 2008 as skittish as they’ve been in years.

All of this is to say nothing of the actual cost of deportation to the federal government. According to ThinkProgress, the long process of “apprehending, detaining, processing, and transporting” every undocumented immigrant beyond U.S. borders would cost somewhere between $400 and $600 billion (focusing just on workers would cost about $114 billion, according to the CAP report). Even if the federal government attempted to spread these costs over several years, jailing every undocumented immigrant in the country would cost roughly $902 million annually, or $9 billion over a decade. And let’s not forget the the American citizen children of undocumented parents: Raising them through age 18 after throwing their parents out if the country would cost around $118 billion, according to the CMS report.


Those additional costs are going to fall on Trump administration already facing tax revenue shortfalls thanks to the broader economic effects from mass deportations — and facing losses up to $900 billion over the next decade. “Federal government revenues are roughly proportional to GDP, while federal spending is less responsive,” CAP researchers Ryan Edwards and Francesc Ortega explain. “With associated increases in interest payments, removal would thus raise the federal debt by $982 billion by 2026 and increase the debt-to-GDP ratio, a common measure of fiscal sustainability, by 6 percentage points over the same time period. Unsustainably high levels of the debt-to-GDP ratio may ultimately raise interest rates and choke off economic growth.”

The week the Trump administration unveiled its new deportation regime, activists staged “A Day Without Immigrants,” a nationwide strike by immigrant workers designed to make their potential absence felt in the wallets of both their employers and lawmakers. Perhaps that symbolism went unnoticed in the White House—but a glance at the national balance sheet might get the president’s attention.

Source: Pacific Standard

Osun university set to expel 4000 students for allegedly investing school fees into MMM

For owing tuition fees running into N2billion, 4,410 students of the Osun State University may be expelled from the institution.

In a statement released on Monday by management of the university in Osogbo, the school authority said it was disheartening that over 4000 students were yet to pay their school fees two days to the deadline.
PUNCH reports that many of the defaulting students had collected the money from their parents and guardians but had either invested the money into the failed MMM or diverted same to other matters.


Osun university set to expel 4000 students for allegedly investing school fees into MMM
University students writing exams

The authority said students who fail to meet the deadline and did not want rustication should apply in writing to the authorities to grant leave of absence for the current semester, pledging to make payments before resumption.

 According to the statement: “Over 4,000 students of Osun State University may lose their studentship for failing to pay their school fees before the expiration of February 28, 2017 deadline set by the university management.

 No fewer than 400 parents/guardians of the defaulting students have called the university help lines to report that they had long given money to their children/wards.


“The university senate at its meeting of January 26, 2017, after observing that a large number of students had refused to turn up in spite of ceaseless appeals, decided that the students’ portal be reopened longer into the 12th week of resumption against the four weeks stipulated in the university regulations.

“The decision of the university senate, which was adequately communicated to all the students on February 2, 2017, was to afford more students the opportunity to pay their fees with effect from 17th to 24th February, 2017, a date which was later extended till February 28, 2017.”


Source: Naij

Donald Trump’s Approval Ratings Have Finally Stabilized, but What Does That Mean?

It’s possible that Trump is operating close to his ceiling right now—and it’s a very low ceiling.

Donald Trump pauses during a campaign event on September 6th, 2016, in Virginia Beach, Virginia. (Photo: Alex Wong/Getty Images)

As has been reported extensively, Donald Trump’s job approval ratings started low relative to other new presidents and have declined ever since. Yet, as Patrick Egan has noted, those ratings seem to have stabilized over the past few weeks, with an average approval rating around 43 percent. Has Trump found his floor? His ceiling? What does this mean?

There are a few ways to think about this. First, it’s worth noting that Barack Obama’s approval ratings were in the mid-40s for most of his presidency. They didn’t start there, of course — he was in the low 60s at this point in his first term — and his approval went up considerably during his last year in office. But we should keep in mind that the economy was expanding, the crime rate was dropping, and the United States was at relative peace with other nations for most of Obama’s presidency. Those are conditions most presidents would pay a high price for, and yet they didn’t seem to benefit Obama much politically until the very end.

Why? To a large extent, it’s because we’re living in a very polarized era. Partisans tend to view new political information in a way that’s advantageous for the party they like and disadvantageous for the party they don’t like. Obama had the approval of 81 percent of Democrats even in 2010, when the Democrats got shellacked in the mid-term elections. He had 13 percent approval among Republicans that year. Trump right now has the support of 87 percent of Republicans and 8 percent of Democrats.

 

This suggests that, in such a polarized era, it’s hard to do a whole lot worse than 40 percent, and it’s hard to do a whole lot better than 50 percent. Your party will support you, the other party will oppose you, and it’s really just a matter of independents moving around.

But that’s not really the whole story. George W. Bush also governed during a very polarized era, and he managed to have approval highs near 90 percent and lows near 20 percent. The difference there was that the fundamental conditions of the country, which were relatively calm during Obama’s presidency, really did rocket back and forth under Bush. His highs came right after the 9/11 attacks (even Democrats were willing to rally behind him for a while), and his lows came during a recession and a prolonged war with Iraq (when even Republicans began to abandon him). It takes a lot to shake partisans, but it does happen.

Part of what’s driven Democrats and independents away from Trump so quickly is Trump’s own behavior. He hasn’t made any of the bipartisan overtures new presidents typically make, and he seems to have gone out of his way to anger and alienate people who weren’t part of his electoral coalition. That behavior really isn’t alienating many Republicans, 90 percent of whom voted for him after more than a year of similar behavior. But it’s likely suppressing his support. It’s worth recalling that his election odds improved in early November of last year at the time he went relatively quiet on Twitter.


But it’s also quite possible that Trump is operating close to his ceiling right now. With each passing week, he is given greater credit or blame for the fundamental conditions of the country. And given that economic growth has been strong so far this year, inflation and gas prices remain low, we’re not at war, crime remains low, etc., and he’s still in the 40s, it’s unlikely things will get a whole lot better for him. It’s certainly possible a 9/11-like tragedy could induce a rally effect for Trump, but it’s not obvious that it would.

Should those fundamental conditions shift toward the worse — and keep in mind it’s been roughly a decade since the U.S. last experienced a recession — some Republicans would likely abandon Trump. And given how few Democrats and independents are with him, we could see his ratings quickly plummet.

In the meantime, there’s good reason to think his popularity will stay roughly as it is. Americans have a pretty good idea how Trump behaves and governs at this point. Those who are approving of the job he’s doing aren’t doing so out of ignorance — they like it this way.

Source: Pacific standard

Photo of Buhari and his daughter in London emerges

Photo of President Muhammadu Buhari with his daughter, Hadiza, in London has emerged.

The photo surfaced online on Monday, February 27.

Photo of Buhari and his daughter in London emerges

However, it is not clear the exact date the photo was taken.

 It appears Nigerians are more concerned about the president repeating the same dress in all his pictures.

 
Photo of Buhari and his daughter in London emerges 

 Photo of Buhari and his daughter in London emerges 

Photo of Buhari and his daughter in London emerges 

President Buhari is currently in London on an indefinite leave. He left the country on January 19 on a 10-day leave and has since extended the leave on medical grounds.

 His absence has been trailed with so such controversy with the presidents aides trying to calm Nigerians and assure them that Buhari is doing fine.

 While in London, The national leader of the All Progressives Congress, Bola Tinubu, Senate president Bukola Saraki, Speaker of the House of Representatives Yakubu Dogara and some other prominent Nigerians have visited him.
Also, Buhari spoke with the president of the United States of America, Donald Trump, on Monday, February 13.
The presidency has been releasing photo evidence to show that the president is hale and hearty. There several photos of the president receiving visitors in London.
However, some Nigerians have refused to believe the pictures are real and have claimed they are Photoshopped.

 Several photoshopped pictures have surfaced online ever since. Earlier, someone had made a Photoshop of Tuface Idibia, the popular musician sitting with Buhari.
In another one, a Facebook user Photoshopped herself posing with Buhari.
The Don Jazzy-led Mavins Records crew also deemed it fit to photoshop themselves visiting the president in London.
Will Buhari return? Watch Nigerians react in the video below.

Source: Naij.com

Today's Devotion (Tuesday)


An Unruly Tongue

PSALM 12:1-8


Key Verse:

"They speak vanity every one with his neighbour: with flattering lips and with a double heart do they speak" (Psalm 12:2).

Disappointments, disagreements and destructions are some of the tragic occurrences in human history. These are often associated with the misuse of the tongue. Yet, it is quite surprising that many people have not learnt to refrain from unguarded speech. The Psalmist raised some issues that are crucial to the happiness of all people. With genuine concern, he observed the absence of godly and faithful persons whose presence would have sanitized society and enhanced high morality among the people. Alas, their presence bred vanity, flattery, proud talks and oppression. They say: "With our tongue will we prevail; our lips are our own: who is lord over us" (verse 4). God answered them and rose to the help of the oppressed. It may sometimes take long, but God will not fail to come to the rescue of the oppressed and the less privileged. Instead of destroying lives through thoughtless words, we can bless others. We can comfort and not curse. We can use this "comely part" to benefit others. Why use your tongue recklessly and risk God’s anger? Remember, "...every idle word that men shall speak, they shall give account thereof in the day of judgment" (Matthew 12:36). Let us bless God and His creatures at all times with our tongue; therein is our blessings.

Thought for the day: Those who have the mastery over the tongue, tame the monster.

Bible Reading in one Year: 1 SAMUEL 3-5

Why Meaningful Diversity in Government Matters

From senior staffers to cabinet picks, the lack of meaningful diversity in Trump’s administration runs through, and runs deep.

President Donald Trump looks on as Betsy DeVos speaks at the DeltaPlex Arena in Grand Rapids, Michigan. (Photo: Don Emmert/Getty Images)

 I witnessed, by chance, the swearing in of the first set of senior staff for the Trump administration. I sat in awe as I witnessed something I hadn’t seen in a long time, having spent the last several years working for the Obama administration: a sea of white faces being sworn in — white, male faces, to be exact. I shouldn’t have been surprised, but there I was — surprised. Surprised that America was not reflected in the first round of political appointees to assume the White House under this administration. Surprised that the platform on which Donald Trump ran — making America great again — did not reflect the America that he now serves.
Yet that trend continues. From senior staffers to cabinet picks, the lack of meaningful diversity runs through, and runs deep. Sure, there’s a token here and there, or they sit people of color in the background during the press spray when Trump is making passing remarks about Black History Month, but none of that represents meaningful diversity.


Though minor in the grand scheme of the current political climate, we saw Trump speak rather unintelligently about Frederick Douglass. He described Douglass as “an example of somebody who’s done an amazing job and is getting recognized more and more, I notice.” Many were dumbfounded by this comment. Perhaps, and only perhaps, if he had the right personnel made up in part of people of color, Trump could have used it as an opportunity to inform the public about who Douglass was — a great orator, writer, abolitionist, and statesman of the 19th century. He could have done a lot more on the topic of black history, but, as a starting point, he could have spoken more intelligently about Douglass. But this is also assuming he even cared.

Much deeper than helping a president connect with the communities he’s engaging with is the opportunity to influence and carry out policies that affect millions of Americans and to recognize the diversity of our people in the policies that get put forward. We often make the mistake of thinking, because we’ve read about a certain issue or engaged with a particular people, that we “get it” and can speak for something or about someone ad nauseum, or that we somehow know enough that we don’t need their perspectives in the room. Men cannot speak for women. Young adults can’t speak for seniors. Childless women cannot speak for mothers. White people can’t speak for black people. Each of these groups can be an ally, especially as it’s impossible to always have every possible diversity attribute represented, but it is necessary and not sufficient.
Depending on the topic and what’s at stake, we need to ensure the right voices are heard and included at the table.

I spent well over a decade of my career working on public education from multiple vantage points. I went to Catholic schools from kindergarten to 12th grade, so I really didn’t understand the issues in public education until I started to read about them. I got smarter about the challenges and opportunities when I started working for a school district. I got even smarter when I spent time in schools observing and listening to educators. My learning curve has climbed every year since. So while I believe I can intelligently represent the interests of educators, my understanding alone is insufficient. I continue to need their voices and perspectives. The work and world is ever changing, and it’s nuanced such that I shouldn’t ever expect to understand all the nuances.

Likewise, I wonder if Betsy DeVos has a teacher working closely on her communications team. She recently tweeted, after her first day of work as secretary of education, “… now, where can I find a pencil. :)” That tweet created a strong backlash, particularly from teachers, for her lack of understanding about the challenges of teaching, including how teachers frequently have to buy their own supplies because the school budget does not provide for everything they and their students need. I suspect that, if DeVos had a teacher on staff who understood these complexities, she may not have made that blunder. Maybe.


There was a recent film released named Hidden Figures that’s received much acclaim about African-American women’s contributions to NASA during the civil rights era. While it would be easy to cite the more notable government figures who made a strong impact on our society, like Patricia Roberts Harris, Antonio Villaraigosa, John Lewis, Shirley Chisolm, Sonya Sotomayor, and Eric Holder, the reality is that there are more hidden figures of diverse backgrounds who have helped advance the progress of our country and government as we know it than will ever be captured.

In a country where we’re experiencing deep divides in where we are and how to move forward, if we want to continue to be a global leader, make the United States a land of opportunity for all, and help those who want a better life for themselves and their families, we’ll need our government to reflect the diversity of its people.

Source: Pacific Standard

Donald Trump’s Military Spending Goals Will Be Tough to Meet — Here’s Why



Trump says he’ll call for a 10 percent increase in military spending, but making budget cuts elsewhere could prove unpopular with his base.

Earlier today, the White House announced that President Donald Trump’s upcoming budget will call for an increase of $54 billion (or approximately 10 percent) in defense-related spending. The spending will be paid for by budget cuts elsewhere (the Environmental Protection Agency, the Department of State, and some social safety net programs are being targeted), although administration officials told the New York Times that Medicare and Social Security, which the president promised to protect during the campaign, would be shielded.

 
(Chart: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities)
 
This will be, to put it mildly, extremely difficult to pull off. The chart to the left, from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, a progressive think tank, illustrates how the government spent its $3.7 trillion budget in fiscal year 2015.

In fiscal year 2015, the United States government spent $888 billion dollars on Social Security (or 24 percent of the budget), $546 billion on Medicare (about 15 percent), and $602 billion (16 percent) on “defense and security related international activities.” The government spent another $223 billion (about 6 percent) on interest payments on the national debt, a spending category that is also (presumably) not vulnerable to budget cuts.

In other words, the categories that the administration either can’t touch (interest payments), has vowed not to touch (Social Security and Medicare), or is promising to boost spending for (defense) represent approximately 60 percent of the federal budget. The rest of the budget consists of spending on things like education; benefits for veterans; social safety net programs like Medicaid, the Earned Income Tax Credit, and food stamps (all programs that disproportionately benefit white, working-class voters); and transportation infrastructure (another category in which Trump has proposed massive spending increases). Cuts to most of these programs and services may please budget hard-liners in the GOP, but they’ll be hugely unpopular with Trump’s base.

Source:  Pacific Standard

Monday, February 27, 2017

You have to check out Juve's squad list for semi-final against Napoli

Coppa Italia holders Juventus have announced a 21-man squad for Tuesday night's semi-final first leg against Napoli.

Claudio Marchisio misses the match after sustaining bruising to his right knee during Saturday’s win over Empoli.
Stefano Sturaro is also out with a recurring injury to his abdomen muscles, while Medhi Benatia is suffering a bout of gastroenteritis.
Coach Massimiliano Allegri's selection in full is as follows: 
1 Buffon
, 3 Chiellini, 
5 Pjanic, 
6 Khedira
, 7 Cuadrado, 
9 Higuain
, 12 Alex Sandro, 
15 Barzagli, 
17 Mandzukic
, 18 Lemina
, 19 Bonucci, 
20 Pjaca, 
21 Dybala, 
22 Asamoah
, 23 Dani Alves
, 24 Rugani
, 25 Neto
, 26 Lichtsteiner
, 28 Rincon, 
32 Audero
, 38 Mandragora.
Source: All Football

Outcry in Algeria after policeman caught on video slapping student

A video showing a policeman slapping a protesting student has triggered widespread condemnation in Algeria, with local activists calling out the excessive force being used by security forces on peaceful protesters.
The unnamed Algerian policeman was deployed with security forces to disperse student protests in central Algeria last week.
Students from the faculty of pharmaceutical medicine at Mustapha Pacha hospital were organizing a demonstration against high youth unemployment when Algerian policemen were deployed to disperse them by force.
Activists took to social media to demand disciplinary action be taken against the policeman with the hashtag “Slapping of the student should not go unpunished” quickly trended on Twitter in Algeria all week.

The video which surfaced online this week also showed other policemen assaulting students with batons and forcing them on what looked like a bus.
Activists have deplored the use of excessive force by police in handling peaceful rallies in Algeria.
Local media reported on Sunday that Algerian Interior Minister Noureddine Bedoui has ordered the immediate suspension of the policeman in question pending further investigations into the incident.
Source: All arabiya

Former Chelsea goalkeeper Marco Amelia completes move to Vicenza

Vicenza have announced that they have completed the signing of goalkeeper Marco Amelia on a free transfer.

In October 2015, the veteran Italian stopper was signed by Chelsea as Jose Mourinho looked for an experienced deputy for Asmir Begovic when Thibaut Courtois was sidelined through injury.
However, Amelia failed to make a single appearance for the Blues and was subsequently released in June, but it has taken him over eight months to find a new club.
Vicenza are currently struggling in 20th place in Serie B, but that has not stopped the former AC Milan and Italy goalkeeper signing a contract until the end of the season.
In September, Amelia had trained with Sunderland after an injury to Vito Mannone but Black Cats boss David Moyes eventually opted against handing him a contract.
Source: All Football

Radja Nainggolan: Roma can beat anyone

Radja Nainggolan claims Roma “can beat anyone, if we play our football” as the Giallorossi “can still win three trophies” this season.
Roma trail seven points behind Juventus in Serie A but are the Old Lady’s nearest challengers, as well as being in the Coppa Italia semi-finals, where they will face arch-rivals Lazio, and the last 16 of the Europa League.
“Villarreal? We didn’t expect such a result at Villarreal because in recent years they’d always achieved great results in Europe,” the midfielder, who scored twice in Sunday’s 3-1 win against Inter, told UEFA’s official website.
“But this is football, we played well ... I don’t think it was our best game, but we took every chance.
“It was a great result and after a 4-0 win away in the first leg, it wasn’t easy to play the return leg.
“We made a lot of changes, thinking about the difficult games waiting for us in the League and Coppa Italia. In the end, we qualified and it was the only thing that mattered.
“Worried about a Villarreal comeback? Honestly, when they scored the first goal and created a couple of chances to score a second, I thought it could become difficult.
“But in the end, we defended well. It wasn’t a great game, but we knew that only the result [over both legs] mattered. We had a great advantage and played with confidence.
“We’re still in the running for three competitions, we can still win three trophies. Right now, we’re focused on the League.
“Favourites in the Coppa? Honestly, to be favourites is always difficult, there’s more pressure.
“But we’re a good team and we must believe in our quality. If we play our football, I think we can beat anyone.
“Lyon in the last 16? The draw wasn’t lucky because we wanted to face a team that were less strong.
“But in the end, if you don’t meet a strong team in this round, you will in the next, so it doesn’t change match. You must beat everyone to lift the trophy and that’s what we’ll do.
“Knowledge of Lyon? I know Yanga-Mbiwa, who played with us last season, and I think he’s a great player.
“The team, in general, are doing well. They beat AZ and made everything seem easy, but I think we’re much stronger than AZ and they’ll definitely find it harder against us.”
Source: All Football

Governor El-Rufia receive Former President Olusegun Obasanjo at Kaduna International Airport

Former President of Nigeria, Olusegun Obasanjo, is currently in Kaduna for a one-day working visit. Upon his arrival at the Kaduna International Airport, he was received by the Kaduna state governor, Nasir El-Rufai. More photos after the cut.



 
 

The United Kingdom will begin trial of former Petroleum Minister, Diezani Alison-Madueke

The United Kingdom will begin the trial of former Minister of Petroleum Resources Mrs. Diezani Alison-Madueke, and four others  in London, in June 2017, over allegations of corruption and money laundering.

Diezani who has been in the UK since 2015, is alleged to have stashed in the UK, proceeds from corrupt practices she got while in office.
The National Crime Agency, a national law enforcement and police agency in the United Kingdom.(NCA), on October 2nd 2015 arrested Alison-Madueke and four others including her brothers, for alleged bribery and corruption and money laundering.

According to The Nation, a source at EFCC says one of the suspects to be tried alongside the former minister was recently found at a hideout in London. The source denied cliams in some quarters that the antigraft agency was in a secret negotiation with her.
“The UK investigators have gone far on the allegations against Diezani. From the records made available, the ex-minister and four others will face trial as from June. We have taken more evidence to the UK, including all court records relating to the final forfeiture of $153million. We have a huge pile of documents. In fact, one of the suspects on the radar of investigators has been located in London and he is under surveillance.”
Addressing claims of a negotiation between the agency and the former Minister, the source said
“There is no basis to negotiate with the ex-Minister in view of the overwhelming evidence at our disposal. You should ask yourself what purpose the negotiation will serve. The EFCC is set for the trial of the ex-minister at home and abroad. It is curious to be talking of a curious negotiation with someone who has a prima facie case to answer. The ex-minister has forfeited $153m; we have had far-reaching investigation on her involvement in the $115m poll bribery scandal; we have seized some of her choice properties and she has consistently maintained that she is ready for trial. So, what is the basis for negotiation when we have a good case?”
Messrs Abiye Agama and Somye Agama are Mrs Alison-Madueke siblings who operate some UK-based businesses hurriedly shut them after the NCA and the EFCC searchlight became intense.

The two brothers are directors of Hadley Petroleum Solutions Limited, a company the authorities believe was  used for money laundering. The other directors are Ugonna Madueke and Abu Fari.

The company was registered in June 2013 in Manchester, but was dissolved less than two years later last  February without filing any account.

Abiye, 33, a point man of the firm, is a computer engineer and manager. He was a director in 11 other companies. He resigned from seven of them.

According to EFCC records, some of the assets  linked with Mrs. Alison-Madueke are:

    A block of six units service apartments on Awolowo Road, Ikoyi
    Six units terrace flats in Yaba, Lagos Mainland
    Twin four-bedroom duplexes in Lekki Phase I
    Two duplexes on Banana Island
    A duplex in Asokoro District, Abuja
    A mini-estate in Mabushi, Abuja
    A set of 12 terrace duplexes at Omaremi Street  in Port Harcourt
    Large expanse of land at Oniru, Victoria Island in Lagos
    A multi-billion Naira estate in Yenagoa
    Two apartments in Dubai marked as J5 Emirates Hills (30million Dirham) and  E146 Emirates Hills valued at 44million Dirham
    A hotel in Port Harcourt under investigation
    $37.5m mansion on Banana Island in Lagos.

But Alison-Madueke had disputed some of the slush funds and assets  attributed to her including the $153million.

In a statement she released, Diezani maintained that the $153 million recently seized was her personal money and that she can and will never steal form the Nigerian government
“I have up till now chosen to maintain my silence and not to respond to inaccurate press reporting. However, given the level of deliberate inaccuracies, I am now forced to respond because it is clear that the EFCC is taking advantage of my silence to try me by media and to convict me in the eyes of the public on false reports. First and foremost, whilst the reasons for my being out of the country are public knowledge, the principle of fair hearing demands that I should have been notified of formal charges if truly there was a prima facie evidence or indictment against my person linking me with the said issue, so as to ensure that I had adequate legal representation. This was never done. I wish to state that I cannot forfeit what was never mine. I do not know the basis on which the EFCC has chosen to say that I am the owner of these funds as no evidence was provided to me before the order was obtained and they have not in fact served me with the order or, any evidence since they obtained it. I do not therefore, understand how the EFCC can in the same breath say that the monies in question are mine. If they had evidence that the monies were mine then they would not /should not, have used the procedure which applies only to funds of unknown ownership. If indeed they used this particular legal procedure because they did not know who owned the monies, then how can they now be falsely attributing the ownership to me. Let me re-state categorically as I have always maintained, for the record, I have not and will never steal money from or defraud the Federal Government of Nigeria.  I am willing to respond to any charges brought against me that follow duly laid down procedures.”

deparadigm

Fire Outbreak: Fuel tanker explodes along Oshodi/Apapa Express road

 
 
A petrol tanker went up in flames in Apapa, Lagos state yesterday February 26th. Men of the Lagos state Emergency Management Authority LASEMA were on hand to put out the fire. Thankfully no life nor property was lost. More photos after the cut.



 
 
 

Today's Devotion (Monday)



Two Destinies, One Way


MATTHEW 7:13-20



Key Verse:

"Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it" (Matthew 7:14).

One of the difficulties travelers on first visit usually face is finding their way. The difficulty becomes complex if the traveler comes to a crossroads where he/she has to take a decision which way to go. At such a time, it becomes imperative to seek a guide. The same is true of every person who is a stranger in the journey of life. Two ways are before us all. One is straight and narrow which leads to eternal life; the other is broad with a wide gate. The first way leads to eternal life with God but the latter to hell with Satan. The text gives an example of broadway travelers - the false prophets and their followers. These are easily identified by the evil fruit they bear. Their evil character and conduct are manifest to them, to onlookers and God. Jesus Christ is the true and only way to life. To find Him, you must humble yourself, turn from your sins and accept Him as Lord and Saviour. That is why the way is narrow but not impassable. When you come on this way, your life is transformed and you are able to bear fruit of righteousness. You cannot be born into this way nor come on it by good works. Entrance is only through repentance and faith in Christ. The broadway is the way of the world. It is so wide that there is no restraint. All men are born into it. Broadway travelers are also known by the works of the flesh they manifest. The choice is yours today, and your choice will ultimately determine where you will spend eternity; either in hell or in heaven. Are you on the narrow or on the broadway? Are you living a righteous or sinful life? If you are still on the broadway, it is not difficult to come into the narrow way. Jesus has paid the price for your redemption. Come now, for all things are ready for you.

Thought for the day: The way of the cross leads home.

Bible Reading in one Year: 1 SAMUEL 1-2

Sunday, February 26, 2017

Buhari’s aides bar family, friends, ministers from seeing president

  • Four aides of President Buhari are said to control access to him as he continues on his extended medical vacation in London, and they are:
  • At least one or more of these four aides must give their approval to anyone who wants to telephone or see the president in London
  • Apart from Ogun state governor Ibikunle Amosun, a very close of President Buhari's, two other individuals who are exempted from seeking permission to visit Buhari or call him are Acting President Yemi Osinbajo and First Lady Aisha Buhari
  • A government source, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorised to speak on the subject, confirmed the arrangement and the names on the list

Buhari’s aides bar family, friends, ministers from seeing president
First Lady Aisha is one of three people allowed unfettered access to President Buhari in London
Access to President Muhammadu Buhari in London has been streamlined to just a few individuals who are approved by some of Nigeria’s number one citizen’s very powerful aides.
The Punch reports that the aides have barred family members; friends and senior government officials who attempted to call or pay visits to the president in the United Kingdom.
Four aides of President Buhari are said to control access to him as he continues on his extended medical vacation in London, and they are:
1. President’s nephew Mamman Daura
2. Senior Special Assistant to the President on Domestic Affairs Sarki Aba
3. Buhari’s Chief of Staff Abba Kyari
4. Personal Assistant to the President Tunde Sabiu
The Punch learnt that at least one or more of these four aides must give their approval to anyone who wants to telephone or see the president in London.
A government source, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorised to speak on the subject, confirmed the arrangement and the names on the list.
Buhari’s aides bar family, friends, ministers from seeing president
Mamman Daura, President Buhari's nephew, is said to be one of the aides that control access to him in London.
“The names you have are accurate and they are the ones controlling access to the President in London, even in Nigeria. Some ministers, aides and service chiefs tried to talk to the President on the phone, but they turned them down.
“The few people that have seen the President only saw him because they agreed to it. If they didn’t, it would never have happened, apart from Governor Amosun, who everyone knows is one of Buhari’s best friends.”

But there are two other individuals who are exempted from seeking permission to visit Buhari or call him. These are Acting President Yemi Osinbajo and First Lady Aisha Buhari.
However, Aisha, whose relationship with these presidential aides has not always been cordial, is reportedly unhappy with the arrangement.
The Punch quoted a source in government, who spoke on condition of anonymity, as saying that Buhari’s wife has told close friends and associates that the cabal she complained about in her controversial interview with the BBC were still the ones in charge of her husband in London.
“The First Lady is not with him permanently in London, which should normally not be the case. She has had a few clashes with the cabal and she is not happy that they are also firmly in control in London. That’s why she goes and comes. She is not happy with the atmosphere over there.”
The powerful four are said to have turned down numerous requests from the President’s friends, associates and members of his cabinet to see him.
NAIJ.com recalls that Special Adviser to the president on media and publicity Femi Adesina gave a clear indication of this arrangement when he expressed great joy at speaking with President Buhari on Saturday, February 25.
Adesina, who is the president’s spokesman, has not spoken to him in one month although he had claimed he could have access to Buhari if he wanted.
Source: Naij

Pele's son to serve 13 years in jail for money laundering and drug trafficking


A Brazilian court has ruled that Brazilian football legend, Pele‘s son who was convicted of money laundering and drug trafficking, must begin serving nearly 13 years in prison. Edinho, whose full name is Edson Cholbi do Nascimento was originally sentenced to 33 years in 2014. But due to a lengthy appeals process, the 46-year-old did not serve the sentence until the new court ruling was handed down on Friday, February 24, 2017.

The judge who presided over the case reduced the sentence to 12 years and 10 months.

Pele's son to serve 13 years in jail for money laundering and drug trafficking


Despite his father yet to comment on the sentence, Edinho who was a goalkeeper for several clubs in Brazil in the 1990's, including Pele's home club FC Santos maintained his innocence and vowed to continue fighting the charges.
'I am very frustrated because I am being accused of money laundering and I never did that, there is no evidence of that,' he told reporters.

Deparadigm 

US Democrats pick Perez as chairman to lead party against Trump

Tom Perez addresses the audience after being elected Democratic National Chair during the Democratic conference. (Reuters)

US Democrats elected former Labor Secretary Tom Perez as chairman on Saturday, choosing a veteran of the Obama administration to lead the daunting task of rebuilding the party and heading the opposition to Republican President Donald Trump.
Members of the Democratic National Committee, the administrative and fundraising arm of the party, picked Perez on the second round of voting over US Representative Keith Ellison, 
a liberal from Minnesota.
Following one of the most crowded and competitive party leadership elections in decades, Perez faces a challenge in unifying and rejuvenating a party still reeling from the Nov. 8 loss of Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. He immediately made Ellison his deputy.
After losing the presidency and failing to recapture majorities in Congress, party leaders are anxious to channel the growing grassroots resistance to Trump into political support for Democrats at all levels of government across the country.
“We are suffering from a crisis of confidence, a crisis of relevance,” Perez, a favorite of former Obama administration officials, told DNC members. He promised to lead the fight against Trump and change the DNC's culture to make it a more grassroots operation.
Perez, the son of Dominican immigrants who was considered a potential running mate for Clinton, overcame a strong challenge from Ellison and prevailed on a 235-200 second-round vote. Ellison, who is the first Muslim elected to the US Congress, was backed by liberal leader US Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont.
The showdown between candidates backed by the establishment and progressive wings of the party echoed the bitter 2016 primary between Clinton and Sanders, a rift Democrats will try to put behind them as they turn their focus to fighting Trump.
Those divisions persisted through the months-long race for chair, as many in the party's liberal wing were suspicious of Perez's ties to the establishment and some Democrats raised questions about possible anti-Semitism in Ellison's past.
Some Ellison supporters chanted “Not big money, party for the people” after the result was announced.
But both Perez and Ellison moved quickly to bring the rival factions together. At Perez's urging, the DNC suspended the rules after the vote and appointed Ellison the deputy chairman of the party.
“I am asking you to give everything you've got to support Chairman Perez,” Ellison told DNC members after the vote. “We don't have the luxury, folks, to walk out of this room divided.”
'TRUMP'S NIGHTMARE'
Perez said the party would come together.
“We are one family, and I know we will leave here united today,” Perez said. “A united Democratic Party is not only our best hope, it is Donald Trump's nightmare.”
Trump took a dig at Perez and Democrats in a tweet offering his congratulations on the election.
“I could not be happier for him, or for the Republican Party!” Trump said.
Perez and Ellison wore each other's campaign buttons and stood shoulder-to-shoulder at a news conference after the vote. Perez said the two had talked “for some time” about teaming up, and Ellison said they had “good synergy.”
“We need to do more to collaborate with our partners in the progressive movement,” Perez said, adding he and Ellison would look for ways to “channel this incredible momentum” in the protests against Trump and against Republican efforts to repeal President Barack Obama's healthcare plan.
Source: Al arabiya